The Protest at the Middle School click here for full versionThisdemonstration,initiatedbyconcernedparents,focusesontheupcomingintroductionofa specificcurriculumdesignedbyanexternalorganization,HiTOPS.Thiscurriculum,titled Intersectionality,Privilege,andMicroaggressionheldwithinaclasscalledPathwaytoRacial Literacy, has sparked a heated debate among the parent community.Attheheartofthiscontroversyisthecurriculum'sapproachtosocietalissues,particularlythose relatedtoraceandLGBTQmatters.HiTOPSappearstoframetheseissuesthroughalensof oppressorandoppressed,aperspectivethathasraisedalarmamongparents.Theconcernis thatsuchadivisiveapproachmaynotonlyoversimplifycomplexsocialdynamicsbutalsosow discord among students.Theideologicalrootsoftheoppressor/oppressedideologyinHiTOPSlessoncanbetraceback toseveralcontentioustheoriesfromneo-MarxistFrankfurtSchooltoCriticalRaceTheory.Inone ofHiTOPSslidefromthelessonexplicitlyreferencedKimberleCrenshawthewellknownCRT theorist as the person who coined the term intersectionality
Whilethecurriculumdoesn'texplicitlyusetheterm'oppressor',buttheimplicationispresent. Whensomestudentsarelabeledasoppressed,itnaturallyleadstotheinferenceofother students in the role of an 'oppressor' in this context.TheHiTOPSlessonisoftendefendedbytheschoolandboardofeducationasanecessityto fulfillastatemandates.However,acloserexaminationofthesampleactivitiesandlessonsfor grades6through8revealsasignificantdisconnectbetweenitandHiTOPScurriculum emphasizingprivilegedversusoppressedgroups,adirectionthatmarkedlydeviatesfromthe mandate's intended scope.
Thelessonplanincludesanactivitywherestudentsmayrevealpersonalinformationabouttheir privilegesandoppression.Thisraisesquestionsaboutprivacyandethicsineducation,as studentsshouldhavethechoicetoprotecttheirpersonalinformation,whichisprotectedby law.Thecurriculum'soversimplifiedoppressor-versus-oppressedframeworkrisksexcusing inappropriatebehaviorbystudentswhomayattributeitsolelytotheirstatusastheoppressed, undermining personal responsibility and hindering personal growth and accountability.Studentslabeledas'privileged'mayself-censor,fearingtheirviewpointsareinherentlyflawed duetosocietalstatus,stiflingopendialogueandimpedingcriticalthinkingdevelopment, impacting their confidence and growth.Categorizationofstudentsoppressor(privilege)statusbasedonuncontrollableidentityfactors may harm their mental health, contradicting the school's commitment to promoting well-being.TheHiTOPScurriculum'sideologiesextendbeyonditscontent,subtlyprimingstudentsto critiqueandpursuereformonhowtoaddressserioussocialissuesthroughaspecificdisruptive ideological lens rather than a constructive method.Parents,voiceyourconcernsanddemandtheschoolandboardofeducationtochangethe curriculum.Steertheeducationalfocusbacktosubjectsandapproachesthatbuildacohesive, informed,andresilientsociety.Thefutureofourchildrenandtheintegrityofoureducational system depend on our willingness to stand up for these fundamental principles.YoucanattendaboardofeducationmeetingtoexpressyourconcernsaboutHiTOPS curriculumduringpubliccomment.ThenextmeetingwillbeonTuesday,January30.The meeting could be in-person or Zoom it is TBD. Please check with PPS website.Contact info for the Board of Education and Princeton Public School:Board of Education - ppsboe@princetonk12.orgAssistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, Dr. Kimberly Tew - KimberlyTew@princetonk12.orgSupervisor of Humanities (Grades 6-12), Keisha Smith-Carrington - Keishasmith-Carrington@princetonk12.orgActing Superintendent, Dr. Kathie Foster - KathleenFoster@princetonk12.orgPrinceton Middle School Principal, Jason Burr - jasonburr@princetonk12.orgWeinviteyoutoconnectwithus.Pleaseemailhello@prepyes.orgforthelatestupdates regardingthisissueortoshareanyinformationorconcernsaboutthecurriculumbeingtaught in our schools.
TheProtestattheMiddleSchoolclick here for full versionThisdemonstration,initiatedbyconcerned parents,focusesontheupcomingintroductionof aspecificcurriculumdesignedbyanexternal organization,HiTOPS.Thiscurriculum,titled Intersectionality,Privilege,andMicroaggression heldwithinaclasscalledPathwaytoRacial Literacy,hassparkedaheateddebateamongthe parent community.Attheheartofthiscontroversyisthecurriculum's approachtosocietalissues,particularlythose relatedtoraceandLGBTQmatters.HiTOPS appearstoframetheseissuesthroughalensof oppressorandoppressed,aperspectivethathas raisedalarmamongparents.Theconcernisthat suchadivisiveapproachmaynotonly oversimplifycomplexsocialdynamicsbutalsosow discord among students.Theideologicalrootsoftheoppressor/oppressed ideologyinHiTOPSlessoncanbetracebackto severalcontentioustheoriesfromneo-Marxist FrankfurtSchooltoCriticalRaceTheory.Inoneof HiTOPSslidefromthelessonexplicitlyreferenced KimberleCrenshawthewellknownCRTtheorist asthepersonwhocoinedtheterm intersectionality
Whilethecurriculumdoesn'texplicitlyusethe term'oppressor',buttheimplicationispresent. Whensomestudentsarelabeledasoppressed,it naturallyleadstotheinferenceofotherstudents in the role of an 'oppressor' in this context.TheHiTOPSlessonisoftendefendedbythe schoolandboardofeducationasanecessityto fulfillastatemandates.However,acloser examinationofthesampleactivitiesandlessonsforgrades6through8revealsasignificant disconnectbetweenitandHiTOPScurriculum emphasizingprivilegedversusoppressedgroups, adirectionthatmarkedlydeviatesfromthe mandate's intended scope.
Thelessonplanincludesanactivitywhere studentsmayrevealpersonalinformationabout theirprivilegesandoppression.Thisraises questionsaboutprivacyandethicsineducation, asstudentsshouldhavethechoicetoprotect theirpersonalinformation,whichisprotectedby law.Thecurriculum'soversimplifiedoppressor-versus-oppressedframeworkrisksexcusing inappropriatebehaviorbystudentswhomay attributeitsolelytotheirstatusastheoppressed, underminingpersonalresponsibilityand hindering personal growth and accountability.Studentslabeledas'privileged'mayself-censor, fearingtheirviewpointsareinherentlyflaweddue tosocietalstatus,stiflingopendialogueand impedingcriticalthinkingdevelopment,impacting their confidence and growth.Categorizationofstudentsoppressor(privilege) statusbasedonuncontrollableidentityfactors mayharmtheirmentalhealth,contradictingthe school's commitment to promoting well-being.TheHiTOPScurriculum'sideologiesextend beyonditscontent,subtlyprimingstudentsto critiqueandpursuereformonhowtoaddress serioussocialissuesthroughaspecificdisruptive ideologicallensratherthanaconstructive method.Parents,voiceyourconcernsanddemandthe schoolandboardofeducationtochangethe curriculum.Steertheeducationalfocusbackto subjectsandapproachesthatbuildacohesive, informed,andresilientsociety.Thefutureofour childrenandtheintegrityofoureducational systemdependonourwillingnesstostandupfor these fundamental principles.Youcanattendaboardofeducationmeetingto expressyourconcernsaboutHiTOPScurriculum duringpubliccomment.Thenextmeetingwillbe onTuesday,January30.Themeetingcouldbein-personorZoomitisTBD.PleasecheckwithPPS website.Contact info for the Board of Education and Princeton Public School:Board of Education - ppsboe@princetonk12.orgAssistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, Dr. Kimberly Tew - KimberlyTew@princetonk12.orgSupervisor of Humanities (Grades 6-12), Keisha Smith-Carrington - Keishasmith-Carrington@princetonk12.orgActing Superintendent, Dr. Kathie Foster - KathleenFoster@princetonk12.orgPrinceton Middle School Principal, Jason Burr - jasonburr@princetonk12.orgWeinviteyoutoconnectwithus.Pleaseemail hello@prepyes.orgforthelatestupdates regardingthisissueortoshareanyinformationor concernsaboutthecurriculumbeingtaughtin our schools.